Bug(?) int delete operator (egcs 1.1b)
Piotr Gackiewicz
gacek@ds14.agh.edu.pl
Wed Nov 11 04:46:00 GMT 1998
Hi.
$ egcs -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.57/specs
gcc version egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release)
I found strange behaviour of 'delete' operator.
Try compiling andr running this bit of code:
----- test.C -----
class m {
public:
m(){};
~m(){};
};
void fun(m **c)
{
*c = new m[4]; /*Wird thing - if you create less than 4 objects, it
works!*/
return;
}
int main()
{
m *b;
fun(&b);
delete b; /* If changed to 'delete[]' it works also */
return 0;
}
----- End of file -----
Comments:
I KNOW, the standard says: use 'delete[]' for tables. But IMHO, such
statement shouldn't give SIGSEGV error.
Piotr Gackiewicz.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list