Missing implicitly declared member functions

[Klaus-Georg Adams]

Valentin Bonnard writes:

> struct T
> { 
>   // T* operator& () { return this; }
> };
> 
> int main ()
> {
>   T* (T::*a) () = &T::operator&; // ERROR
>   const T* (T::*b) () const = &T::operator&; // ERROR
>   T& (T::*c) (const T&) = &T::operator=; // OK
>   T x;
>   if (0)
>     x.~T (); // OK
> }
> 
> Both & are missing.

Hi Valentin,
how did you get the idea that operator&() should be implicitely
declared and defined? In the ISO/IEC document, chapter [special] it is
not mentioned. The special member functions mentioned are
- The default constructor [class.ctor]
- The copy constructor and opy assignment operator [class.copy]
- The destructor [class.dtor]

-- kga
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Klaus-Georg Adams        Email: Klaus-Georg.Adams@chemie.uni-karlsruhe.de
Institut f. Anorg. Chemie, Lehrstuhl II            Tel: 49(0)721 608 3485
Universität Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe
-------------------------------------------------------------------------