continuing egcs-1.1 problems
Jeffrey A Law
Wed Nov 11 00:26:00 GMT 1998
In message < XFMail.firstname.lastname@example.org >you write:
> On 11-Nov-98 David Edelsohn wrote:
> > *NO* patches to work around this trampoline mess (neither the
> > tramp.asm compare sense nor increasing the trampoline size from 40 to 48
> > bytes) will be applied to egcs-1.1 or any other version as this was not a
> > bug in any official GCC or EGCS distribution. If there still is a stack
> > alignment bug, we need to track that down and fix the code in GCC to
> > maintain alignment.
> How is it possible that the stack remain 16 byte aligned when an object
> (the trampoline code) of only 40 bytes is being created [on the stack]?
Because code elsewhere is supposed to guarantee that stacks are always
We've been through this before.
More information about the Gcc-bugs