Why 0 is not int* ? Error with sample of Bjarne Book

[Alexandre Oliva]

Khimenko Victor <khim@sch57.msk.ru> writes:

> Yes. !1 is false but still false could be evaluted to 0.

You're right, `!1' could be promoted to (int)0, then converted to any
pointer type, since it is a null pointer constant.  This should be
accepted, and egcs is in error.  Too bad :-(

-- 
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil