PATCH: http://egcs.cygnus.com/cvs.html (was: ./configure broke)
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Tue Mar 24 17:13:00 GMT 1998
In message <Pine.GSO.3.96.980324224026.26450g-100000@alcyone.dbai.tuwien.ac.a>you write:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> >> How about a minor change to http://egcs.cygnus.com/cvs.html , namely
> >> `s/update/update -P -d/` in
> > Generally I would not recommend -d. Then again that may be because
> > I usually work in a much larger repository [...]
>
> My idea was that pros like you for sure will know what -d does and refrain
> from using it unless appropriate, while Joe Average Egcs-Evaluator will
> benefit by not falling into the same trap I as did yesterday...
Actually, the reason I don't recommend -d is because it's likely
(IMHO) to cause problems than fix them for "joe average egcs evaluator".
The only time -d is useful is when new directories are added *and*
you're trying to update an existing tree. We don't add directories
often.
However, consider what happens if you just check out part of the
tree (for example you just want C & C++). A later cvs update -d
will suck in all those directories you didn't check out earlier.
There's no "right" answer here, just general "gut feelings" about
what's likely to cause more problems...
jeff
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list