Patch for better diagnostic (was: Re: Bug in MI?)

[Manfred Hollstein]

On , 6 March 1998, 08:18:48, oliva@dcc.unicamp.br wrote:

 > Manfred Hollstein writes:
 > 
 > >> It would be even better if we could list those functions...
 > 
 > > Actually, they are listed (abstract_virtuals_error from cp/typeck2.c):
 > 
 > Ok, I couldn't analyse the code as I should, so I was not sure both
 > error messages would be presented at once.  In this case, shouldn't we
 > do a two pass loop, listing real abstract functions, then functions
 > that need a final overrider?

That would be even better ;-) But again, what do you think about
citing the language standard where appropriate?

manfred