function overloading broken in egcs-980302 ?
Ian Haggard
ian@shellus.com
Tue Mar 3 12:50:00 GMT 1998
David C Binderman wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> Given the following code on machine i486-pc-linux-gnulibc1, with
> compiler G++ in egcs-980302, I was surprised to find that it compiled ok.
>
> void
> f( int i)
> {
> };
>
> void
> f( int & ri)
> {
> };
>
> I even tried flags -O -Wall -ansi -pedantic, and the code still compiled !
This is not an error. If you want an error, add these lines to your test-case:
int main(int argc,char** argv)
{
f(argc); // ERROR! Ambiguous overload resolution..
f(1); // OK. Because 1 is a constant, it can't be passes as a non-const ref
}
With respect to function overloading, C++ takes the stance that a potential
ambiguity is not an error until you attempt to use it.
--
Ian Haggard || ian@shellus.com (work) || IanHaggard@juno.com (home)
GNU/Linux -- "Oh, no, Mr Bill!" || #define employer_opinion !my_opinion
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list