shared library version number snafu?

[Ronald Cole]

Jeffrey A Law writes:
>  In message < 199806092018.NAA00812@yakisoba.forte-intl.com >you write:
>  > >"27.2.1"?!?  I think that is the snafu.  I belive that should
>  > >be 2.7.2.1.
>  > 
>  > Snafu?  I would be interested in why you think it is.  However, here's
>  > why I think it's not:
>Because there's no such thing as libg++-27.*
>
>There was libg++-2.7.2, possibly even libg++-2.7.2.1, presumably
>one of HJ's releases.
>
>If someone hacked the version # because some tool couldn't handle
>a 4 part version #, then that person is to blame for the snafu.

You actually haven't looked at one of HJ's releases, have you?

-- 
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA  93556-1412
Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com>      Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO                             Fax: (760) 499-9152
My PGP fingerprint: 15 6E C7 91 5F AF 17 C4  24 93 CB 6B EB 38 B5 E5