[patch] Re: Wrong destruction order of static objects in g++
Alexandre Oliva
oliva@dcc.unicamp.br
Sun Jun 7 13:00:00 GMT 1998
Kaveh R Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
>> From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
>> Richard Henderson <rth@dot.cygnus.com> writes:
>> > Don't forget to exit(0).
>> There's no need for that in C++. Falling off main() is equivalent to
>> returning zero.
> Also, doesn't calling exit(0) bypass destructors?
Only destructors of automatic objects are bypassed. Other than that,
returning from main must be equivalent to calling exit(), as stated in
[basic.start.main]/5
--
Alexandre Oliva
mailto:oliva@dcc.unicamp.br mailto:aoliva@acm.org
http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list