Definite Pentium Pro problems...

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 199802221918.OAA25800@cise.ufl.edu >you write:
  > Oh well.  And Jeffrey A Law writes:
  >  - 
  >  - It would be *amazingly* helpful if you could try it with the current
  >  - release branch (I assume you were picking up the mainline sources).
  >  - If it breaks there then it's priority goes way up :-)
  > 
  > The Mesa and Lapack sources work with -O and -march=pentiumpro in the 
  > release branch as of Friday.  There don't seem to be any unresolved
  > labels as link points, and the lower-level compiler doesn't die.  Keen.
OK.  Thanks for checking.  Our primary concentration right now is on
the 1.0.2 release, so it's good to know it's working properly.

  > BTW, on a very minor point, I keep getting the silly ``warning: return 
  > type of `main' is not `int''' in straight C code (both rel branch and 
  > normal one)...  Is that really necessary?  Personally, I prefer main to 
  > be void.
Yes it is necessary.  ANSI requires the return type of main to be
an "int".


jeff