C++ typedefs

[Martin von Loewis]

I find that egcs rejects

void X(){}
typedef int X;

as invalid C++ (redeclared as different kind of symbol). I cannot find
the place in the draft where it says that this is ill-formed. Instead,
typedefs are explained as declaring new types in [decl.typedef]. In
turn, it should be possible to have a typedef with the same name as a
function, whereas

class X{};
typedef int X;

should be incorrect (and is detected as such).

So, my interpretation would be that above program is correct, and
that the function shadows the typedef. Comments?

Martin