built-in declaration conflicts on SunOS & VxWorks targets (patch)

Brad M. Garcia bgarcia@fore.com
Thu Feb 19 06:01:00 GMT 1998


On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Mike Stump wrote:

> Your patch is wrong. 

Well, it was correct in that it actually worked.
It was wrong in that it was the wrong way to solve the problem.

> I don't ordinarily read mime stuff.

I should have included the patch inline.  Sorry about that.

> There is a #define SIZE_TYPE in the configuration file that is wrong
> for your platformm but you never said what this is on...  I'll
> guess you wanted this for i386-wrs-vxworks:

I didn't define a platform because my problem applied to all VxWorks
platforms.

But (I believe) my problem was not with the definition of SIZE_TYPE,
but due to the fact that the compiler was not accessing the "fixincludes"
version of the header files.

I haven't confirmed this yet, but I will soon.

BTW, you wouldn't happen to know of a patch to gcc or egcs (and binutils)
for producing i960 ELF code, would you?


Brad Garcia
   ___/  __ /  __ /  ___/ "Being the Linux of digital media
  __/   /  /  / _/  __/    would be a very good life."
_/    ____/ _/ _| ____/      - Jean-Louis Gassee, CEO of Be, Inc.




More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list