patch: `/*' within comment in gcc/config/m88k/m88k.h

Manfred Hollstein manfred@s-direktnet.de
Wed Feb 18 11:22:00 GMT 1998


On Wed, 18 February 1998, 08:47:37, law@hurl.cygnus.com wrote:

 > 
 >   In message < 9802181239.AA07266@lts.sel.alcatel.de >you write:
 >   > This one is really annoying; each file includes this one resulting in
 >   > lots of warnings like this:
 >   > 
 >   > In file included from ../../egcs-980218/gcc/config/m88k/sysv3.h:24,
 >   >                  from tm.h:1,
 >   >                  from ../../egcs-980218/gcc/config/m88k/xm-m88k.h:61,
 >   >                  from ../../egcs-980218/gcc/config/m88k/xm-sysv3.h:22,
 >   >                  from config.h:2,
 >   >                  from ../../egcs-980218/gcc/tree.c:36:
 >   > ../../egcs-980218/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.h:550: warning: `/*' within comment
 >   > 
 >   > May I check this in?
 >   > 
 >   > Wed Feb 18 13:34:29 1998 Manfred Hollstein <manfred@s-direktnet.de>
 >   > 
 >   > 	* m88k.h: Add white space around file pattern to suppress
 >   > 	`/*' within comment warning.
 > Why not just change the comment to more closely match current
 > reality?  "config/m88k" would seem like a better choice to me since
 > all the m88k specific files live in a subdirectory now :-)

Of course, you're right.

Wed Feb 18 20:13:42 1998 Manfred Hollstein <manfred@s-direktnet.de>

	* m88k.h: Change file pattern to match reality.

diff -p -u egcs-980218.orig/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.h egcs-980218/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.h
--- egcs-980218.orig/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.h	Fri Dec 19 17:42:59 1997
+++ egcs-980218/gcc/config/m88k/m88k.h	Fri Dec 19 17:42:59 1997
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ extern char * reg_names[];
     are still no registers to be had for free, but this one must be a GRF
     reg instead of an extended reg, so a preserve register is spilled.  Thus
     the move from extended to GRF is necessitated.  I do not believe this can
-    be 'fixed' through the config/*m88k* files.
+    be 'fixed' through the files in config/m88k.
 
     gcc seems to sometimes make worse use of register allocation -- not counting
     moves -- whenever extended registers are present.  For example in the



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list