Final patch for `Re: [971016]: PICFLAG vs. multilib - solution'
Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de
Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de
Mon Feb 16 03:59:00 GMT 1998
On Sun, 15 February 1998, 21:25:39, law@hurl.cygnus.com wrote:
>
> In message < 199802151213.NAA31447@saturn.s-direktnet.de >you write:
> > Although the ChangeLog entry is there, the patch for Makefile.in is
> > missing in the current CVS sources.
> >
> > Sun Feb 15 13:11:15 1998 Manfred Hollstein <manfred@s-direktnet.de>
> >
> > * Makefile.in (BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS): Don't pass PICFLAG and
> > PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
> > (EXTRA_TARGET_FLAGS): Don't pass PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
> Weird. Not sure what happened to it.
>
> Please install this change. (Boy it's nice to be able to say that :-)
>
$ cvs commit egcs/ChangeLog egcs/Makefile.in
cvs commit egcs/ChangeLog egcs/Makefile.in
cvs [server aborted]: "commit" requires write access to the repository
cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsBAAa006vv
??? I thought I'm allowed to write ???
Manfred
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list