Final patch for `Re: [971016]: PICFLAG vs. multilib - solution'

Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de Manfred.Hollstein@ks.sel.alcatel.de
Mon Feb 16 03:59:00 GMT 1998


On Sun, 15 February 1998, 21:25:39, law@hurl.cygnus.com wrote:

 > 
 >   In message < 199802151213.NAA31447@saturn.s-direktnet.de >you write:
 >   > Although the ChangeLog entry is there, the patch for Makefile.in is
 >   > missing in the current CVS sources.
 >   > 
 >   > Sun Feb 15 13:11:15 1998  Manfred Hollstein  <manfred@s-direktnet.de>
 >   > 
 >   > 	* Makefile.in (BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS): Don't pass PICFLAG and
 >   > 	PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
 >   > 	(EXTRA_TARGET_FLAGS): Don't pass PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
 > Weird.  Not sure what happened to it.
 > 
 > Please install this change.   (Boy it's nice to be able to say that :-)
 > 

$ cvs commit egcs/ChangeLog egcs/Makefile.in 
cvs commit egcs/ChangeLog egcs/Makefile.in
cvs [server aborted]: "commit" requires write access to the repository
cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsBAAa006vv

??? I thought I'm allowed to write ???

Manfred



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list