Final patch for `Re: [971016]: PICFLAG vs. multilib - solution'

[Manfred Hollstein]

On Fri, 6 February 1998, 01:37:14, law@hurl.cygnus.com wrote:

 > 
 >   In message <9710231238.AA29528@lts.sel.alcatel.de>you write:
 >   > ChangeLogs:
 >   > 
 >   > toplevel dir:
 >   > Thu Oct 23 14:03:59 1997  Manfred Hollstein  <manfred@s-direktnet.de>
 >   > 
 >   > 	* Makefile.in (BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS): Don't pass PICFLAG and
 >   > 	PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
 >   > 	(EXTRA_TARGET_FLAGS): Don't pass PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
 >   > 
 [snip]
 > Thanks.  I've installed this patch.
 > jeff

Although the ChangeLog entry is there, the patch for Makefile.in is
missing in the current CVS sources.

Sun Feb 15 13:11:15 1998  Manfred Hollstein  <manfred@s-direktnet.de>

	* Makefile.in (BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS): Don't pass PICFLAG and
	PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.
	(EXTRA_TARGET_FLAGS): Don't pass PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET.

diff --context --recursive --show-c-function -x *.o -x *.info* -x *.html* -x *.elc -x *.dvi -x *.orig -x *~ -x version.el egcs-980214.orig/Makefile.in egcs-980214/Makefile.in
*** egcs-980214.orig/Makefile.in	Sun Feb  1 02:41:23 1998
--- egcs-980214/Makefile.in	Sun Feb 15 10:42:55 1998
*************** BASE_FLAGS_TO_PASS = \
*** 344,351 ****
  	"MAKE=$(MAKE)" \
  	"MAKEINFO=$(MAKEINFO) $(MAKEINFOFLAGS)" \
  	"NM_FOR_TARGET=$(NM_FOR_TARGET)" \
- 	"PICFLAG=$(PICFLAG)" \
- 	"PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET=$(PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET)" \
  	"RANLIB_FOR_TARGET=$(RANLIB_FOR_TARGET)" \
  	"SHELL=$(SHELL)" \
  	"EXPECT=$(EXPECT)" \
--- 344,349 ----
*************** EXTRA_TARGET_FLAGS = \
*** 402,408 ****
  	'LIBCFLAGS=$$(LIBCFLAGS_FOR_TARGET)' \
  	'LIBCXXFLAGS=$$(LIBCXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET)' \
  	'NM=$$(NM_FOR_TARGET)' \
- 	'PICFLAG=$$(PICFLAG_FOR_TARGET)' \
  	'RANLIB=$$(RANLIB_FOR_TARGET)' \
  	'WINDRES=$$(WINDRES_FOR_TARGET)'
  
--- 400,405 ----