Protected constructor access rules changed?

Jason Merrill jason@cygnus.com
Thu Feb 5 18:38:00 GMT 1998


>>>>> Mark Mitchell <mmitchell@usa.net> writes:

> Shouldn't your patch handle destructors, and assignment operators?
> Also, what about constructors other than the default
> and copy constructor?

I believe the intent was that constructors should be handled like static
members in some cases, since they do not operate on specified objects.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list