XPASS in c++ testsuite

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Dec 19, 1998, Mark Mitchell <mark@markmitchell.com> wrote:

>>>>>> "Zack" == Zack Weinberg <zack@rabi.columbia.edu> writes:
Zack> XPASS: g++.other/conv5.C discarding const - (test for
Zack> errors, line 6)

> Alexandre checked in this test, I think, and I think it always
> passed.  I think he wanted to test what would happen without
> -pedantic, perhaps?

It's more likely that I had just failed to test it with -pedantic :-(

But now that you mention it, since we're moving to make egcs more
ISO-C++ compliant by default, shouldn't this be at least a warning
without -pedantic?

I'm modifying this testcase so as to compile with none of the default
flags.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva  http://www.dcc.unicamp.br/~oliva  aoliva@{acm.org}
oliva@{dcc.unicamp.br,gnu.org,egcs.cygnus.com,samba.org}
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brasil