PATCH for access control on member templates.
Mark Mitchell
mmitchell@usa.net
Wed Apr 22 10:57:00 GMT 1998
Turns out we weren't doing access control for member templates.
Here's a fix. OK?
--
Mark Mitchell <mmitchell@usa.net>
http://home.earthlink.net/~mbmitchell
Consulting Services Available
Wed Apr 22 10:51:48 1998 Mark Mitchell <mmitchell@usa.net>
* class.c (finish_struct): Set TREE_PRIVATE and TREE_PROTECTED for
the DECL_RESULTs of a member TEMPLATE_DECL, not just the
TEMPLATE_DECL.
Index: class.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /egcs/carton/cvsfiles/egcs/gcc/cp/class.c,v
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -c -p -r1.40 class.c
*** class.c 1998/04/09 20:36:38 1.40
--- class.c 1998/04/22 17:50:10
*************** finish_struct (t, list_of_fieldlists, at
*** 4318,4323 ****
--- 4318,4329 ----
TREE_PRIVATE (x) = access == access_private_node;
TREE_PROTECTED (x) = access == access_protected_node;
+ if (TREE_CODE (x) == TEMPLATE_DECL)
+ {
+ TREE_PRIVATE (DECL_RESULT (x)) = TREE_PRIVATE (x);
+ TREE_PROTECTED (DECL_RESULT (x)) = TREE_PROTECTED (x);
+ }
+
/* Check for inconsistent use of this name in the class body.
Enums, types and static vars have already been checked. */
if (TREE_CODE (x) != TYPE_DECL && TREE_CODE (x) != USING_DECL
Index: ../testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/memtemp74.C
===================================================================
RCS file: memtemp74.C
diff -N memtemp74.C
*** /dev/null Mon Dec 31 20:00:00 1979
--- memtemp74.C Wed Apr 22 10:56:36 1998
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,21 ----
+ // Build don't link:
+
+ template <class T>
+ class S
+ {
+ protected:
+ template <class U>
+ void f(U); // ERROR - is protected
+
+ private:
+ template <class U>
+ void g(U); // ERROR - is private
+ };
+
+
+ void f()
+ {
+ S<double> s;
+ s.f(3); // ERROR - within this context
+ s.g(2.0); // ERROR - within this context
+ }
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list