[Patch, fortran] PR119273 - [14/15/16 Regression] subclass can not correctly access to superclass in associate statement

[Harald Anlauf]

Hi Paul,

this looks good to me, so OK from my side.

Thanks for the patch!

Harald

P.S.: We have a couple of other cases where we evaluate expressions
with side-effects more than once, contrary to what the standard says.
Once we solve this, we might be able to get rid of your new warning ;-)

On 3/24/26 17:53, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Please find attached a version of the patch that excludes implicitly
> pure procedures from the bounds warning.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Paul
> 
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2026 at 10:42, Paul Richard Thomas
> <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> The attached fixes the above regression. I would have pushed it as
>> obvious were it not for my decision to warn for index expressions
>> containing functions not declared to be pure. If the warning is
>> thought to be OTT, I can remove it.
>>
>> Also, note the pointer assignment at the end, which demonstrates that
>> this regression is not specific to the associate statement but to
>> pointer expressions in general.
>>
>> Regtests with FC43/x86_64 - OK for all the affected branches?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Paul