[r16-4474 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_atomic_5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "value.. = 0;" 1 on Linux/x86_64
Yuao Ma
addr2line@gmail.com
Tue Oct 21 13:38:11 GMT 2025
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:15 PM Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> taking the address of a constant like in &0 is usually a bad idea. Therefore in
> this location it makes sense to have &value. Please do not modify the testcase,
> but fix the code generation!
Got it. I already have a fix. Will post it soon.
More information about the Fortran
mailing list