[Patch, fortran] PR95543 & PR103748 - Fix some minor PDT parse errors

[Jerry D]

On 10/11/25 5:17 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> These fixes are minor on the scale of things and fix no fewer than
> three problems (2 PRs):
> 
> (i) PR95543 exposed two separate bugs. The first was that default
> initializer expressions that are not constants, were not being
> expanded so that the name of the PDT instance could not be generated
> and an ICE was caused downstream. This is fixed by the first two
> chunks in the patch. Once this was fixed, comparison with other brands
> showed the testcase failing at the declaration "      type(t()) :: z"
> because the type specification list is empty, contrary to F2023 R755:
> type-param-spec is     [ keyword = ] type-param-value. This is fixed
> by the chunk in primary.cc.
> 
> (ii) PR103748 was due to type spec lists being applied to derived
> types that are not parameterized. This is  fixed by the third chunk.
> 
> Regtests with FC42/x86_64 - OK for mainline?
> 
> Paul

Looks good to go Paul. Tests OK here as well.

Thanks,

Jerry