PRs 88052 and 88190
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Sun Sep 8 05:25:47 GMT 2024
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 08:17:42PM -0700, Jerry D wrote:
> Steve and others
>
> We continue to run into issues with PRs like this. I would like to close
> these out. I completely hate the mechanisms we have for the options. Why?
> Because every time I look at it I have to think it through ten ways to
> sunday. It is not straight forward.
>
> What I would like to do is give a hard error fro out of compliance stuff and
> with std=legacy give a warning.
>
> This is almost a policy question really. What is your opinion. Move forward
> with what I just suggested here?
>
See my comment #6 in 88052.
Hindsight is 20-20.
I personally would like to see -std=f2023 made the default.
Any, and all, extensions would require an explicit option to
accept the non-standard Fortran construct.
Unfortuantely, the -std=gnu ship sailed years ago.
--
Steve
More information about the Fortran
mailing list