[Patch, fortran] PR37336 finalization
Steve Kargl
sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Sat Jun 3 07:32:51 GMT 2023
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 07:50:19AM +0200, Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > I propose to backport
> > r13-6747-gd7caf313525a46f200d7f5db1ba893f853774aee to 12-branch very
> > soon.
>
> Is this something that we usually do?
>
> While finalization was basically broken before, some people still used
> working subsets (or subsets that were broken, and they adapted or
> wrote their code accordingly).
>
> What is the general opinion on that? I'm undecided.
>
I think a backport that fixes a bug that is a violation
of Fortran standard is always okay. A backport of anything
else is up to the discretion of the contributor. If pault
or you or harald or ... want to backport a patch, after all
these years, I think we should trust their judgement.
--
Steve
More information about the Fortran
mailing list