maxval on -inf and nan in Fortran
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Fri Feb 28 22:02:00 GMT 2020
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Regarding MIN and MAX: I think the IEEE 754 decided at some point
> decided that MAX(x, NaN) = x (IEEE 754:2008 alias ISO 60559:2011, if I
> recall correctly). I think one has to check what exactly the test case
> does and what is guaranteed where. I also do not know whether a more
> recent IEEE 754 (754:2019) has changed something again.
It has. The maxNum/minNum operations from IEEE 754-2008 were removed and
replaced by recommended operations maximum/minimum (treat NaNs the same
way as other operations do, i.e. produce a quiet NaN result if either
operand is a NaN) and maximumNumber/minimumNumber (return the number if
the other operand is a NaN, even a signaling NaN, with "invalid" raised in
the signaling NaN case). Those new operations also treat +0 as greater
than -0, whereas maxNum/minNum did not specify the result in that case.
(The choice of which operand is the result is still unspecified when the
two operands are different DFP members of the same cohort, i.e. with
different quantum exponents.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Fortran
mailing list