[9/10 Regression, fortran, patch] ICE in simplify_findloc_nodim, at fortran/simplify.c:5513

[Mark Eggleston]

Forgot to add the purpose of the e-mail: OK to commit?

On 24/02/2020 12:24, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> Please find attached a patch to fix PR93835. This patch ensures that 
> the array returned by SHAPE has its shape defined, the original patch 
> from Steve Kargl handled the lack of shape for the returned array.
>
> The bonus white space issues fixed in the original patch have been 
> retained.
>
> A side affect of the patch is a change in the errors expected by the 
> test case pr77351.f90. Instead of "Error: Different shape for 
> elemental binary operation at (1) on dimension 1 (1 and 2)" and 
> "Error: Array operands are incommensurate at (1)" there is only 
> "Error: Shapes for operands at (1) and (2) are not conformable" which 
> is effectively the same.
>
> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
>
> Â Â Â  Mark Eggleston <mark.eggleston@codethink.com>
> Â Â Â  Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> Â Â Â  PR fortran/93835
> Â Â Â  * decl.c (gfc_match_data) : Check whether the data expression
> Â Â Â  is a derived type and is a constructor. If a BOZ constant
> Â Â Â  is encountered in the constructor output an error and return
> Â Â Â  MATCH_ERROR.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>
> Â Â Â  Mark Eggleston <mark.eggleston@codethink.com>
>
> Â Â Â  PR fortran/93835
> Â Â Â  * gfortran.dg/pr77351.f90 : Check for one error instead of two.
> Â Â Â  * gfortran.dg/pr93835.f08 : New test.
>
-- 
https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html