[PATCH] PR fortran/91513 -- Fix poorly worded error message
Janne Blomqvist
blomqvist.janne@gmail.com
Sat Oct 12 07:35:00 GMT 2019
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 7:58 AM Steve Kargl
<sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:56:15PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > In PR fortran/91513, Damian Rouson points out that the Fortran
> > does contain the words "impure variable".
>
> Geez. That is a messed up sentence.
>
> In PR fortran/91513, Damian Rouson points out that the Fortran
> *standard* does *not* contain the words "impure variable.
>
> (It's late, and I'm tired!)
>
> > Damian and I spent
> > an afternoon together a few weeks ago where I gave Damian a
> > world wind view of how I see gcc/fortran and go about debugging
> > problems. Damian and I both have full schedules, but I was
> > hoping he would submit the patch to the list. My time of
> > fixing gfortran bugs is running out, so ...
> >
> > OK to commit?
> >
> > 2019-09-29 Damian Rouson <damain@sourceryinstitue.org>
> >
> > PR fortran/91513
> > * resolve.c (resolve_ordinary_assign): Improved error message.
> >
> > 2019-09-29 Damian Rouson <damain@sourceryinstitue.org>
> >
> > PR fortran/91513
> > * gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_2.f90: Update dg-error regex.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
Ok
--
Janne Blomqvist
More information about the Fortran
mailing list