[PATCH] Fix PR fortran/91716

[Bernd Edlinger]

On 9/13/19 12:16 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:07 PM Bernd Edlinger
> <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this fixes a test case where a short string constant is put in a larger memory object.
>>
>> The consistency check in varasm.c is failed because both types should agree.
>>
>> Since the failed assertion is just a gcc_checking_assert I think a back-port of this fix
>> to the gcc-9 branch will not be necessary.
>>
>>
>> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>> Is it OK for trunk?
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Bernd.
> 
> Ok.
> 

Well, I have mistakenly assumed that this triggers only a "checking" assert,
but it turned out that is not the case, as written in last comment in the BZ,
immediately after that gcc_checking_assert, there is a gcc_assert, and also
an ICE in the gcc-9 branch.  The same patch fixes also the second problem,
and survives reg-bootstrap and testing on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu as expected.


So I would like to ask at this time, if it is also OK for gcc-9 ?


Thanks
Bernd.