[patch, fortran] Fix PR 66089, ICE (plus wrong code) in dependency handling

[Dominique d'Humières]

Hi Thomas,

> Anything else? …

Yes, the tests gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 and gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 fail:

FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90   -O   scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_array_assumed \\\\(D" 3 (found 4 times)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90   -O   scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_array_assumed \\\\(\\\\(struct t1.0:. .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.data\\\\);" 1 (found 0 times)

FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90   -O   scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_array_assumed \\\\(D" 3 (found 4 times)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90   -O   scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_array_assumed \\\\(\\\\(struct t1.0:. .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.data\\\\);" 1 (found 0 times)

TIA

Dominique