[PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

[Jeff Law]

On 8/14/19 2:45 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote:
> I now have commit access.
> 
> gcc/fortran
> 
> Â Â Â  Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
> Â Â Â  Mark Eggleston <mark.eggleston@codethink.com>
> 
> Â Â Â  * gfortran.h: Add gfc_check_conflict declaration.
> Â Â Â  * symbol.c (check_conflict): Rename cfg_check_conflict and remove
> Â Â Â  static.
> Â Â Â  * symbol.c (cfg_check_conflict): Remove automatic in equivalence
> Â Â Â  conflict check.
> Â Â Â  * symbol.c (save_symbol): Add check for in equivalence to stop the
> Â Â Â  the save attribute being added.
> Â Â Â  * trans-common.c (build_equiv_decl): Add is_auto parameter and
> Â Â Â  add !is_auto to condition where TREE_STATIC (decl) is set.
> Â Â Â  * trans-common.c (build_equiv_decl): Add local variable is_auto,
> Â Â Â  set it true if an atomatic attribute is encountered in the variable
>     list.  Call build_equiv_decl with is_auto as an additional parameter.
> Â Â Â  flag_dec_format_defaults is enabled.
> Â Â Â  * trans-common.c (accumulate_equivalence_attributes) : New subroutine.
> Â Â Â  * trans-common.c (find_equivalence) : New local variable dummy_symbol,
> Â Â Â  accumulated equivalence attributes from each symbol then check for
> Â Â Â  conflicts.
> 
> gcc/testsuite
> 
> Â Â Â  Mark Eggleston <mark.eggleston@codethink.com>
> 
> Â Â Â  * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_1.f90: New test.
> Â Â Â  * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_2.f90: New test.
> Â Â Â  * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_3.f90: New test.
> 
> OK to commit?
> 
> How do I know that I have approval to commit?
Yes, this is OK to commit.  Steve acked it in a private message to me.

Normally you'll get an ACK/OK on the public list.  But private ACKs or
ACKs on IRC also count as approval :-)

jeff