[PATCH 08/25] Fix co-array allocation

[Andrew Stubbs]

On 20/09/18 16:56, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> Ok, looks good.

Thanks.

> There are some other remaining incorrect uses of integer_type_node (at 
> least one visible in the diff), but that can be done as a separate patch 
> (not saying you must do it as a precondition for anything, though it 
> would of course be nice if you would. :) )

I'm not confident I can tell what should be integer_type_node, and what 
should not?

Once it gets to build_call_expr_loc it's clear that the types should 
match the function signature, but the intermediate values' types are not 
obvious to me.

Andrew