[RFA] PR 68289 - Missing diagnostic pragmas

[Dominique d'Humières]

Hi Thomas,

Thanks for the quick answer. Don’t waste too much time on this and/or new warnings, specially before the next stage 1!

Cheers,

Dominique

> Le 25 févr. 2018 à 23:16, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> a écrit :
> 
> Dominique,
> 
>> Question 1: Is any reader of this list interested by such pragmas?
> 
> Yes, I think that kind of thing would be handy. I like to
> introduce new warnings, and these pragmas, if people actually
> get to know and use them, could lead to wider adoption of
> options which would otherwise have too many false positives.
> 
>> Question 3: if any yes to questions 1 or 2, is there any chance that someone assign the PR to (her|him)self say within the coming decade?
> 
> I can do so. Mind, I would have to learn a lot how to do this, but this
> might be interesting.
> 
> I've assigned it to myself in the meantime, to keep it open and to make
> sure that I don't forget it. Please don't let anybody keep this from
> doing any actual work on this :-)
> 
> Regards
> 
> 	Thomas
>