[PATCH] PR fortran/79305 -- Fix spelling in #if defined() condition

[Steve Kargl]

I would like to apply the following patch to trunk.  It technically
isn't a regression or documentation fix.  Is this ok with the release
managers?

2017-01-31  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>

	PR fortran/79305
	* libgfortran/c99_protos.h: Spell HAVE_EXPL correctly.
	* libgfortran/intrinsics/c99_functions.c: Ditto.

Index: libgfortran/c99_protos.h
===================================================================
--- libgfortran/c99_protos.h	(revision 244065)
+++ libgfortran/c99_protos.h	(working copy)
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ extern float complex cexpf (float comple
 extern double complex cexp (double complex);
 #endif
 
-#if !defined(HAVE_CEXPL) && defined(HAVE_COSL) && defined(HAVE_SINL) && defined(EXPL)
+#if !defined(HAVE_CEXPL) && defined(HAVE_COSL) && defined(HAVE_SINL) && defined(HAVE_EXPL)
 #define HAVE_CEXPL 1
 extern long double complex cexpl (long double complex);
 #endif
Index: libgfortran/intrinsics/c99_functions.c
===================================================================
--- libgfortran/intrinsics/c99_functions.c	(revision 244065)
+++ libgfortran/intrinsics/c99_functions.c	(working copy)
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ cexp (double complex z)
 }
 #endif
 
-#if !defined(HAVE_CEXPL) && defined(HAVE_COSL) && defined(HAVE_SINL) && defined(EXPL)
+#if !defined(HAVE_CEXPL) && defined(HAVE_COSL) && defined(HAVE_SINL) && defined(HAVE_EXPL)
 #define HAVE_CEXPL 1
 long double complex cexpl (long double complex z);
 

-- 
Steve
20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow