Fwd: [Bug fortran/79739] [7 Regression] ICE with some interesting code

[Paul Richard Thomas]

Patch committed as obvious/trivial. I didn't think that it warranted a
testcase since there is no way that this one will come back.

Thanks for the report.

Paul



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: 28 February 2017 at 19:32
Subject: [Bug fortran/79739] [7 Regression] ICE with some interesting code
To: pault@gcc.gnu.org


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79739

--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Feb 28 19:32:02 2017
New Revision: 245787

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245787&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-02-28  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/79739
        * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Deal with the case where
        'submodule_name' is NULL so that gfc_error does not ICE.
        Reformat the error message to make it more consistent.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein