Windows support dropped from gcc trunk

[FX]

> I am just finishing up a build of libgfortran using the new
> compiler, after editing the .h files to permit building in spite of the
> lack of support for either real(10) or real(16).  It still looks
> intentional that someone changed libgfortran so that it won't build
> automatically for this case.

I don’t understand what you mean here. I’m not sure if this is meant to be an accusation (against whom?), but please don’t do that. Just point us to 1. what is the actual problem, 2. what change in the libgfortran code lead to it (if you know), and then we’ll fix it.

FX