[Patch, fortran, pr65548, addendum] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

[Thomas Koenig]

Hi Andre,

> Because this patch is obvious I plan to commit it tomorrow if no one objects?!

The patch itself is obviously OK.

About the test case:  In general, it is better not to change existing
test cases unless absolutely necessary (e.g. adjust an error message).
This makes it easier to track regressions.

I would prefer if you made a new test case from your existing one,
with the changes you did and a small explanation of what was
tested in the comments.

If you are worried about runtime for an additonal test, you can use the

! { dg-do  run }

hack (notice the two spaces between the dg-do and the run) to have the
test case execute only once.

OK with that change.

Regards

	Thomas