[patch, libfortran] [4.9/4.10 Regression]PR61049 NIST test FM906 fails

[Jerry DeLisle]

Hi all,

The attached patch fixes this regression and retains the desired behavior for
PR46800. We don't have a test case for PR46800 since it involves user input at a
terminal. (It would be good to get such a test case of course)

This patch has been regression tested with 4.9 and 4.10 on x86-64 linux.

OK for trunk and then 4.9?  Test case from PR.

Regards,

Jerry

2014-05-04  Jerry DeLisle  <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu>

	PR libfortran/61049
	* io/list_read.c (list_formatted_read_scalar): Use eat_separator
	and delete extraneous code.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pr61049.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 952 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20140505/e1fe599f/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: list_read_13.f
Type: text/x-fortran
Size: 349 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20140505/e1fe599f/attachment-0001.bin>