[fortran, patch] Audit and patch of F95 and F2003 "non-default kind specifiers" warnings

[Steve Kargl]

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 09:38:06PM +0200, FX wrote:
> > It seems that some of these extensions are not caught by -std=f95
> 
> I?ve now audited the I/O specifiers for such warnings too. A warning existed only for EXIST, which was introduced way back by Steve:
> 
> > 2010-07-05  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
> > 
> >         PR fortran/44797
> >         * fortran/io.c (resolve_tag): Check EXIST tag is a default logical.
> 
> I?ve extended the logical warning to the NAMED, OPENED, and PENDING specifiers. I?ve also audited the integer specifiers, and extended the warning to NUMBER, NEXTREC, and RECL, which were missing.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-apple-darwin13, OK to commit?
> 

Yes.

-- 
Steve