Fix a function decl in gfortran

Bernd Schmidt bernds@codesourcery.com
Thu Jun 5 11:55:00 GMT 2014


On 06/04/2014 10:36 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> Even with this applied, I'm still seeing similar failures.
>
> I didn't claim that the patch would fix everything – nor that it was
> well tested.

Just wanted to report back since the problem doesn't really show up on 
normal targets.

> Can you try the attached version? The change is that I now properly use
> "se->ignore_optional" to test whether absent optional arguments should
> be skipped - rather than using this mornings ad-hoc solution of doing so
> unconditionally. Additionally, the patch has now survived stage2
> building – which is more testing than I could do this morning.

This seems to work. Thanks!


Bernd



More information about the Fortran mailing list