*PING* Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR58658 - add missing pointer-assign check for CLASS(*)

[Paul Richard Thomas]

Hi Tobias,

Have you checked that:

subroutine sub(a)
  class(*),pointer :: a
  a => null()
end subroutine

does not give an error?  I think that it is why the check was introduced.

Cheers

Paul


On 13 October 2013 09:51, Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de> wrote:
> *PING*: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-10/msg00018.html
>
> Additionally, I'd like to early ping for the do concurrent patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-10/msg00022.html , even if the ME review
> is still pending.
>
> Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>
>> The patch is rather obvious. The question is just why was the check there
>> at the first place.
>>
>> Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
>> OK for the trunk?
>>
>> Tobias
>
>



-- 
The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
       --Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy