*ping* [Patch, Fortran] PR35203 - Fix VALUE + OPTIONAL handling for pass-by-value arguments

[Thomas Koenig]

Hi Tobias,

> The current implementation is slightly different: present and
> string-lengths are in one group, ordered by their appearance. While IBM
> puts them into different groups and puts first all optionals and then
> all string lengths.
>
> It probably makes sense to change this to match IBM's implementation.

This would be an ABI change for code which had both optional value
and string lengths.  It would be less dramatic if we did it the
other way around (first the string lengths, then the optional flags).

OK, for 4.9, we want array descriptor reform including an ABI
change anyway, don't we? :-)

	Thomas