[Patch V2] libgfortran: do not assume libm

[Tristan Gingold]

On Mar 27, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:01, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> this patch fixes this issue.  Is it OK ?
> 
> Ok.

No check-gfortran regressions on x86_64-darwin, committed.

>> Maybe we should include the AC_DEFINE action within GCC_CHECK_MATH_FUNC.  Will try to do that.
> 
> That looks like a cleaner solution, yes, and less chance for typos to sneak in.
> 
>> Sorry for not having noticed this issue before.
> 
> No problem. Thanks for fixing it quickly.

You're welcome!

Tristan.