[patch, fortran] Fix PR 54033, problems with -I, with test cases
Thomas Koenig
tkoenig@netcologne.de
Thu Aug 2 20:08:00 GMT 2012
Hi Tobias,
> I am not sure whether it is the best solution, but one possibility would
> be to ignore -fintrinsic-modules-path for the warning. (That assumes
> that the warning is (almost) never needed for an installed compiler.)
I think this is the right approach. The attached patch does this.
Regression-tested with the finclude directory from the installation.
OK for trunk?
Thomas
2012-08-02 Thomas König <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/54033
* scanner.c (add_path_to_list): New argument warn. Don't
warn if it is true.
(gfc_add_include_path): Warn if directory is missing.
(gfc_add_intrinsic_modules_path): Do not warn if directory
is missing.
* optinons.c (gfc_handle_option): Do not add directory
for intrinsic modules to normal include path.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: regfix.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1952 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20120802/e95e8e98/attachment.bin>
More information about the Fortran
mailing list