[patch, fortran] Function call optimization

Tobias Burnus burnus@net-b.de
Fri Mar 18 23:23:00 GMT 2011


Thomas Koenig wrote:
> +      if (!(*e)->value.function.esym->attr.pure
> +	&&  !(*e)->value.function.esym->attr.implicit_pure
> +	&&  !(*e)->value.function.esym->attr.elemental)
> +	return 0;

I have not followed the discussion nor have I fully read the patch, but 
what's the reason for allowing ELEMENTAL functions? I understand the 
PURE and the implicitly pure part. But without looking at the 
scalarizer, I would assume that the same reasons which speak against 
non-elemental impure functions should also speak against IMPURE 
ELEMENTAL functions, don't they?

Tobias



More information about the Fortran mailing list