Failure of implicit real*8

[Michael D. Berger]

On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:22:57 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 02:13:35AM +0000, Michael D. Berger wrote:
[...]
> Are you serious?  There is too little information here to even guess at
> an answer.  Show us the actual code.
> 
> Well, I do have guess, but you won't care for it. Don't use
> -fdefault-real-8, because this option may not do what you think it does.

Yes, I am serious.  If there is such a bug, I would think someone
would know it from what I said. The subroutine is just a few lines
rearranging the elements of mx using tmp as a buffer.  If there
is a problem in the code, you would need more than this trivial
subroutine to find it.  The code cannot be posted for various
reasons.

I will half follow your advice, both using the option AND explicitly 
declaring the real*8.  BTW, doing that did not change anything.

Mike.