[Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/46794: Fix ICE with powers of integers
Daniel Kraft
d@domob.eu
Sun Dec 5 10:11:00 GMT 2010
Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 10:35:16AM +0100, Daniel Kraft wrote:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>>> Regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu without failures --
>>>> though the run somehow looked strange to me (on the compile-farm);
>>>> I'll try again to be sure. Ok for trunk?
>>> OK for the trunk. Can you check whether one needs to likewise for the
>>> 4.5 and 4.4 branch? (I think one should check on source level - the
>>> verify_tree might not always catch it. For some reasons, it ICEs here
>>> with 4.4 and 4.6 but not with 4.5; however, I think that's rather by
>>> chance and not because of a proper casting.)
>> No further problems with the regtest, thanks for the review! I
>> committed as rev. 167453 to trunk. I will look at the source for 4.4
>> and 4.5 accordingly.
>>
>
> Can you fix the test case to be valid Fortran. k1 and k2
> are used uninitialized.
This is only a compile-test. But I committed the attached patch as
obvious fix to trunk after a successful test on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
and will consider this of course also for the backports.
Daniel
--
http://www.pro-vegan.info/
--
Done: Arc-Bar-Cav-Kni-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Hea-Mon-Pri
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch.changelog
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20101205/81710c27/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch.diff
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20101205/81710c27/attachment-0001.ksh>
More information about the Fortran
mailing list