Proposed gfortran development branch
Thomas Koenig
tkoenig@netcologne.de
Sat Mar 21 09:19:00 GMT 2009
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 10:08 +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Similarly, the array descriptor work should go to a
> development branch.... but should it be the same one?
Probably not; a separate branch would be a good idea.
I've been giving some thought on how to implement the array descriptor
changes in the library. I'd like to
- create macros for accessing the ubound and extent of a descriptor
- implement the macros everywhere throughout the library, removing every
instance of ubound, especially for stride calculation
- "poison" the old ubound by renaming it to u_bound in the header file
- fix compilation errors and fix any regressions :-)
- wait for whatever changes happen to the front end, then just change
the ubound and extent calculation in once central place
This is a very big change in the library, text-wise. I think it would
be good not to mix this with other changes.
Comments?
Thomas
More information about the Fortran
mailing list