[Patch, fortran] PR38657 - [4.3/4.4 Regression] PUBLIC/PRIVATE Common blocks

[Daniel Kraft]

Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Yet another regression squashed.....
> 
> This is verging on obvious.... once the problem is found:-)  The check
> during module writing that ensured that a common block did not get
> written twice was using the common block name rather than the symtree.
>  This is rather akin to renamed use associated symbols, since use
> associated common blocks have their names mangled.  The testcase is a
> fair elaboration on the original to try to mix private and public
> common block variables.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_i64/FC9 - OK for trunk and a week
> later for 4.3?

Ok for both.  Thanks for the patch!

Daniel

-- 
Done:  Arc-Bar-Cav-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Hea-Kni-Mon-Pri-Ran