[PR fortran/38507] Fix checks for valid GOTOs
Tobias Schlüter
tobias.schlueter@physik.uni-muenchen.de
Sun Jan 4 13:04:00 GMT 2009
Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 06:20:31PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>> Dear Tobi,
>>> Built and tested on i686-darwin. Ok?
>> Yes indeed - it's OK by me. This raises the question as to whether we
>> should wait for 4.5? I guess that we could cite a virtual regression?
>>
>
> Well, it fixes a fairly bad bug. It may also fix a regression,
> but someone would need to check gfortran prior to Tobi's
> original bitmap implementation of tracking labels.
Well, I know that the patch which introduced bitmaps (which was intended
to be only a performance patch) reversed the logic from right to wrong.
The patch for PR17708 already introduced a wrong warning in 2004.
For the record, I don't think it's a bad bug, just a wrong warning, but
the patch comes at low risk (at worst replacing a wrong warning by
another wrong warning), but I'll leave it up to your to discretion
whether to apply or not.
Cheers,
- Tobi
>
More information about the Fortran
mailing list