merging of trunk to fortran-dev?

Steve Kargl sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Tue Dec 29 17:19:00 GMT 2009


On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 09:19:13AM +0100, Janus Weil wrote:
> Hi Daniel, hi all,
> 
> > could someone with experience be so kind to merge current trunk to fortran-
> > dev? I'm almost done with the trees, one more regression to go. Before I
> > submit the final patch, I'd like to update and bootstrap it with the current
> > sources.
> 
> although Daniel's constructor patch presently seems to have no overlap
> with the OOP stuff on the fortran-dev branch, it may not be the
> optimal solution to have them both on the same branch.
> 
> We still have the fortran-experiments branch, don't we? It seems this
> hasn't been used for about two years, so we could just update it to
> current trunk and put Daniel's constructor work there. Or is there any
> reason why we can/should not do that?

The old fortran-experiments branch was/is severely messed-up.
It may be painful to bring it up to date.  I suspect the path
of least resistance would be to create a new branch for Daniel's
work, perhaps, fortran-constructor

-- 
Steve



More information about the Fortran mailing list