PING: [Patch, Fortran] Small fix for type-bound operators and NOPASS

[Daniel Kraft]

Hi all,

ping on this small one.  What do you think?  Should I continue working 
on OPERATOR and just include it or can I commit this patch as fix to my 
already committed OPERATOR support?

Thanks,
Daniel

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Patch, Fortran] Small fix for type-bound operators and NOPASS
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:10:01 +0200
From: Daniel Kraft <d@domob.eu>
To: Fortran List <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
CC: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>

Hi all,

I just started to work on calling type-bound operators, and discovered a
small bug with the last patch.  For type-bound operator procedures,
there must be a passed-object dummy argument (makes sense) -- but that
was not checked, and so it was ok to define some procedure as type-bound
operator that has nothing to do with the type at all.

The attached patch fixes that.  I'm not sure if we should do a seperate
check-in or just combine it with the large follow-up for calls; I think
it is nothing we need to fix for now, but on the other hand it doesn't
really belong to the calling-patch.  So what do you think?

If I should commit this right away, I'll add a ChangeLog and run a
regression-test.  Would it then be ok for trunk?

Yours,
Daniel

-- 
Done:  Arc-Bar-Cav-Ran-Rog-Sam-Tou-Val-Wiz
To go: Hea-Kni-Mon-Pri

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch.diff
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/attachments/20090817/e986f7cc/attachment.ksh>